Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Shackelford

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1871No. 2,523PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from the County Court of Sauta Clara County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court, Crockett, J.:

This is an action for unlawful detainer under the third section of the Act of 1866 (Stats. 1865-6, p. 768). On the trial the Court granted a nonsuit, and the plaintiff having moved for a new trial, which was denied, has brought this appeal. The proof was that in October, 1869, the plaintiff' erected on a quarter section of public land in Santa Clara County a small dwelling-house, in which he slept for several nights, and then returned to San Mateo County, where he had previously resided, with the intention immediately to return with his family to the new house as…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Shelby v. HoustonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Giddings v. '76 Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Hart v. CoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Leroux v. MurdockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1876
  4. Eccles v. Union Pacific Coal Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Landini v. DayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API