Legal Opinion
Landini v. Day
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 24, 1968No. Civ. 23733PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BROWN (H. C.), J.
This is an action wherein both plaintiff James F. Landini and defendant-cross-complainant C. M. Day seek to quiet title to a parcel of real property located in Sonoma County, California.
The plaintiff is the successor in interest to Louis Párente, and the defendant is the successor in interest to Joseph Párente, the brother of Louis Párente.
Louis for many years owned certain real property consisting of about three acres of land in Boyes Springs upon which he conducted a resort known as “The Pahns.” Sometime prior to 1939 he borrowed $60,000 from his brother Joseph. This loan…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Laubisch v. RoberdoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Weller v. ChavarriaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Shelby v. HoustonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- Sheldon v. MullCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- Bradley v. WestSupreme Court of Missouri · 1875
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Taffinder v. ThomasSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1977
- Preciado v. WildeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Johnson v. Ocean Shore Railroad Co.California Court of Appeal · 1971
- Epstein v. Prescott Neighborhood Partners CA1/1California Court of Appeal · 2021