Legal Opinion

Bakery, Laundry, Allied Sales Drivers & Warehousemen, Local No. 289 v. Metz Baking Co.

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided August 26, 1986No. Civ. 4-85-1580PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

MacLAUGHLIN, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on plaintiffs’ objections to the report and recommendation of the United States Magistrate. The Magistrate’s report and recommendation will be adopted as modified.

FACTS

Plaintiffs are Bakery, Laundry, Allied Sales Drivers & Warehousemen, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local 289 (hereinafter Local 289) and Milk Drivers and Dairy Employees Union, Local 471, International Brotherhood of Teamsters (hereinafter Local 471). Defendant is Metz Baking Company, Inc., a Minnesota corporation (Metz). This is an action…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. United Steelworkers v. American Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. LivingstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Daiei, Inc. v. United States Shoe Corp.District Court, D. Hawaii · 1991
  2. ADM Investor Services, Inc. v. Investors Equity Life Insurance Co. of Hawaii, Ltd.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API