Legal Opinion
State v. Guein
Court of Appeals of Kansas
Decided January 20, 2017No. 115426Published
1Opinion of the Court
No. 115,426 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. MARCUS THIASEN GUEIN, JR., Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. When an appellate court reviews the district court's decision on a motion to suppress evidence in a criminal case, we first determine whether the district court's factual findings are supported by substantial evidence. We then review the district court's ultimate legal conclusions independently, without any required deference to its conclusion. When the significant facts are not in dispute, whether to grant or deny a suppression motion…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Yarborough v. AlvaradoSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Colorado v. ConnellySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Oregon v. ElstadSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.