Legal Opinion
Stahlberg v. Hannifin Corporation
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided November 8, 1957No. Civ. A. 6284PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRENNAN, Chief Judge.
The motion made herein challenges the legal propriety of an order permitting the service of a third-party complaint and also the legal sufficiency of said complaint. The factual background disclos ed in the record to date will be briefly-referred to.
In June 1955 the defendant and third-party plaintiff, referred to herein as “Hannifin”, had manufactured and assembled especially for Precision Casting Company Inc. a ten-ton hydraulic press, designed to exert a pressure of one-thousand pounds to the square inch. In the same month, the press was shipped to Precision at…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Campo v. ScofieldNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
- McFall v. Compagnie Maritime Belge (Lloyd Royal) S. A.New York Court of Appeals · 1952
- Albert Banks v. Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corporation, and Ninnie Brothers, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
- Lebeck v. William A. Jarvis, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1956
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Tokio Marine & Fire Insurance v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1978
- Guarnieri v. Kewanee-Ross Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
- Yanick v. Pennsylvania Railroad CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1961
- Santomassino v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1957
- Guarnieri v. Kewanee-Ross CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959