Legal Opinion
Santomassino v. United States
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided November 20, 1957No. Civ. A. No. 6316PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
BRENNAN, Chief Judge.
This motion to dismiss the third-party complaint raises the reoccurring problem *827as to the sufficiency of a third-party pleading in the matter of an attempted recovery over in a negligence action. The ■background of facts, as disclosed by the pleadings, is set out below.
The plaintiff in an action brought under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C.A. §§ 1346, 2671-2680, seeks a money judgment compensating him for personal injuries due to the negligence of the United States or its employees.
About June 9, 1955, Theodore Stay and Sons, a partnership, hereinafter referred to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Dick v. Sunbright Steam Laundry Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1954
- Harvey Miller v. The Pennsylvania Railroad Company, and Third-Party (Allen N. Spooner & Son, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Appellee)Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
- Sientki v. HaffnerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1956
- Stahlberg v. Hannifin CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1957
- Putvin v. Buffalo Electric Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Booth v. Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co. (In Re Cafes Internationale, Ltd.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1981