Legal Opinion

Hughes v. Iandoli

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 28, 1932PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrosby, J.

These are actions of tort to recover for personal injuries received by the plaintiff as the result of being struck by an automobile. The first is brought against the owner of the automobile, and the second against the driver.

The accident occurred on Main Street, in Charlestown, near the Sullivan Square Terminal of the Boston Elevated Railway, the front entrance of which is at the corner of Alford and Main streets. The central portion of Main Street at this place is covered by an elevated railway struc*532turc supported by parallel rows of pillars. The plaintiff testified that the accident…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Duggan v. Bay State Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
  2. Commonwealth v. GettiganMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
  3. Gibb v. HardwickMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
  4. Doyle v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
  5. Bagnell v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Brown v. HendersonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  2. Sooserian v. ClarkMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  3. Noyes v. WhitingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  4. Mroczek v. CraigMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
  5. Pease v. LenssenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API