Legal Opinion

Hash v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided April 4, 2005No. 2003-1395PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PAULINE NEWMAN, Circuit Judge.

Robert Hash, Gerlene Hash, William Don Lakey, and Nancy Hawkins bring this class action affecting approximately two hundred Idaho landowners. The landowners appeal those aspects of the decision of the United States District Court for the District of Idaho as were decided adversely to their “taking” claims under the Fifth Amendment, 1 arising from the conversion of a railroad right-of-way to a recreational trail traversing their lands. We reverse in part, vacate in part, and remand for further proceedings.

BACKGROUND

In the early to mid-1800s the United States…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Preseault v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Wilcox v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
  3. Allen Engineering Corporation v. Bartell Industries, Inc. And Darragh CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
  4. Preseault v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
  5. United States v. SchurzSupreme Court of the United States · 1880

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Castillo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020
  2. Our Lady of the Rockies, Inc. v. PetersonMontana Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Home on the Range v. AT & T Corp.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2005
  4. Illig v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
  5. Ats Ford Drive Investment, LLC v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2025

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API