Legal Opinion
Seymour v. Oklahoma City
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided July 22, 1913No. 3867PublishedCited by 7 opinions
Error from Superior Court, Oklahoma County; E. D. Old-field, Judge. Action by L. K. Seymour against the City of Oklahoma City and others. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.
The plaintiff in error is the owner and holder of certain warrants issued pursuant to section 990, Comp. Laws 1909 (Rev. Laws 1910, sec. 469). He contends that he is entitled to the penalty, provided _ to be paid in case of default in payment as the same matures, and that unless the same is directed to be paid to him, it will be appropriated by the municipality.
Section 990, supra, provides:
“As soon as any district sewer shall have been completed, the city engineer or other officer having charge of the work, shall compute the whole cost thereof, which shall also include all other expenses…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Shultz v. Ritterbusch, County TreasurerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Atwater v. HassettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Stout v. State Ex Rel. CaldwellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Lowther v. NissleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Leatherman v. Incorporated Town of AddingtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Clay v. Independent School District No. 1 of Tulsa CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
- Allen v. PhilpinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
- Board of Com'rs of Oklahoma Co. v. Close Bros.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Board of County Com'rs of Oklahoma County v. SeymourSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- City of Shawnee v. EppleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.