Legal Opinion

Board of Com'rs of Oklahoma Co. v. Close Bros.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 24, 1921No. 10120PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error from District Court, Oklahoma County; John W. Hayson, Judge. Action by Close Brothers- against the Board of Oommissn "evs <>f Oiciaboma Ooujnty to recover part of penalties collected on certain paving warrants. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMcNEILL, J.

This is an action commenced by Close Brothers, a corporation, in the district court of Oklahoma county against the board of county commissioners of Oklahoma county. The petition alleged that Oklahoma City, as authorized by certain ordinances, issued tax, certificates against various lots in Oklahoma City fur paving as required by law, and said tax certificates were certified by the city treasurer to the treasurer of Oklahoma county for the purpose of collecting the same with interest and penalty. It was alleged the plaintiff was the owner of said tax certificates, and the county had collected…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Shultz v. Ritterbusch, County TreasurerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. City of New Whatcom v. RoederWashington Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Hunter, County Treasurer v. State City of ShawneeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  4. Board of Com'rs of Custer County v. City of ClintonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  5. Ritterbusch v. HavinghorstSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Jones v. WilliamsTexas Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Jones v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. Estus v. State Ex Rel. DinwiddieSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  4. Allen v. PhilpinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API