Legal Opinion

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Enzo Guel ROMEO, Defendant-Appellant

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 28, 1997No. 96-50337PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TASHIMA, Circuit Judge:

This is an appeal from an order of the district court denying appellant Romeo’s motion to dismiss the remaining count of a two-count indictment on the ground of collateral estoppel. Because that doctrine implicates the constitutional protection against double jeopardy, we have jurisdiction to review this interlocutory order under Abney v. United States, 431 U.S. 651, 659, 97 S.Ct. 2034, 2040, 52 L.Ed.2d 651 (1977). See United States v. Cejas, 817 F.2d 595, 596 (9th Cir.1987) (extending Abney to collateral estoppel rulings).

I

Romeo was charged in a two-count indictment…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Abney v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. James Pettaway v. Charles Plummer, Sheriff of Alameda CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  5. United States v. John Allen SeleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Yeager v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. United States v. Shukri BakerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
  3. People v. BarraganCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  4. People v. MoralesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  5. United States v. Genaro Smith-BaltiherCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API