Legal Opinion

James Pettaway v. Charles Plummer, Sheriff of Alameda County

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 23, 1991No. 90-15469PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BEEZER, Circuit Judge:

James Pettaway seeks a writ of habeas corpus on the ground that the State of California’s attempt to retry him for murder on the theory that he was the actual perpetrator of the murder violates the Double Jeopardy Clause. In a prior state court criminal proceeding, a jury determined that he did not actually perpetuate the murder. The district court denied the petition. We reverse.

I

At Pettaway’s first state court trial, it was established that on May 1, 1981, Petta-way, Lowana Walker and Michael Seals were at the house of Karen Taylor. At some point, Walker handed…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Tibbs v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Jean Alexander Cosmetics, Inc. v. L'OreaL Usa, Inc. Redkin 5th Avenue, N.Y.CCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
  2. Joseph Bennard Nichols v. Wayne Scott, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
  3. People v. SantamariaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  4. People v. MoralesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  5. United States v. Clarke Dexter WeemsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API