Legal Opinion

United States v. Genaro Smith-Baltiher

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 9, 2005No. 03-50375PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REINHARDT, Circuit Judge.

The issues presented include how courts should determine in a criminal proceeding whether a defendant is a citizen or an alien and whether a good faith belief that one is a citizen is enough to defeat a charge of attempted illegal entry. Genaro Smith-Baltiher was convicted of attempted reentry into the United States in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. He appeals the district court’s rulings that (1) he is collaterally estopped from challenging his status as an alien, (2) he is precluded from presenting evidence of his good faith reasonable belief that he did not need…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. United States v. GaudinSupreme Court of the United States · 1995

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Rosemary Garity v. Apwu National Labor Org.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  2. State of Tennessee v. Joey DeWayne ThompsonTennessee Supreme Court · 2009
  3. United States v. PerlazaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  4. State v. ScarbroughTennessee Supreme Court · 2005
  5. United States v. Flores-VillarCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API