Legal Opinion

Enochs v. Martin Properties, Inc.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 28, 1997No. 88351PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPALA, Justice.

¶ 1 The critical issue on certiorari is whether there was error in the Court of Civil Appeals’ [COCA] disposition of this case by striking testimony adduced by respondent Bud Martin and directing that, on remand, an award be entered for the claimant. We answer in the affirmative and remand the cause to COCA with appropriate instructions.

I

THE ANATOMY OF LITIGATION

¶ 2 Chester Enochs [Enochs or claimant] was employed by Baxter Discount Tire [Baxter Tire] when he sustained injuries by falling off a ladder. Enochs’ Form 3 listed Baxter Tire as the sole respondent. At the hearing on…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Parks v. Norman Municipal HospitalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
  2. Hamid v. Sew OriginalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  3. Reeves v. AgeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  4. Union Texas Petroleum, a Division of Allied Chemical Corp. v. Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  5. Resolution Trust Corp. v. GreerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Manley v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
  2. In Re Baby Girl L.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
  3. Casey v. CaseySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
  4. In the Matter of BTWSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
  5. Durant Civic Foundation, Inc. v. Grand Lodge of Oklahoma of the Independent Order of Odd FellowsCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2008

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API