Legal Opinion
Samuel & Nathan E. Goldstein, Inc. v. Dietz
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided December 7, 1933PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.
The plaintiff brings this suit in equity to establish an indebtedness on a matured promissory note for $9,000 executed and delivered by the defendant Richard H. Dietz, hereinafter called the defendant, to set aside transfers by this defendant of four parcels of real estate, and also to *549declare null and void certain mortgages executed on those parcels of real estate. The bill alleges that the transfers were made with the intent to defeat, delay and defraud the plaintiff and that the other defendants were parties to this fraudulent scheme. The case was referred to a master. He found the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Glover v. Waltham Laundry Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
- C. A. Briggs Co. v. National Wafer Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
- Dondis v. LashMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
- Lovell v. Commonwealth Thread Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
- Peabody v. DymszaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Sagalyn v. Meekins, Packard & Wheat Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- New England Overall Co. Inc. v. WoltmannMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
- Perry v. OliverMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
- Fisher v. MacDonaldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1955
- Perkins v. Becker's Conservatories, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.