Legal Opinion
Perry v. Oliver
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided January 31, 1945PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSpalding, J.
The plaintiffs, who are husband and wife, seek, by this bill in equity, to enjoin the defendant Oliver,2 hereinafter called the defendant, from foreclosing a mortgage; they also ask for a discharge of the mortgage and a cancellation of the mortgage note.
The report of the master to whom the case was referred was confirmed by an interlocutory decree (entered by consent of the parties) from which no appeal was taken. The findings of fact of the master thus became conclusive bé-tween the parties. Samuel & Nathan E. Goldstein, Inc. v. Dietz, 284 Mass. 548. A final decree was entered discharging…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Old Dominion Copper Mining & Smelting Co. v. BigelowMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
- Corey v. HavenerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1902
- Porter v. SorellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
- Cote v. New England Navigation Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
- Ansara v. ReganMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Pineo v. WhiteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
- Beaton v. Land CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- Rock-Ola Manufacturing Corp. v. Music & Television Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
- New England Overall Co. Inc. v. WoltmannMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
- Tucker v. PochMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.