Legal Opinion
Peabody v. Dymsza
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided October 6, 1932PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.
The plaintiffs seek in this suit in equity to rescind an exchange of real estate between the parties on the ground of fraud and deceit by the defendants Dymsza (hereafter called the defendants) whereby the plaintiffs were induced to enter into the transaction, to recover their damages and to obtain other relief. The case comes before us on appeal from a final decree entered pursuant to ' findings of fact made by the trial judge. No evidence is reported. In brief it was found that the plaintiffs were induced to their harm to make the exchange through the fraud and misrepresentations of the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Institution for Savings in Newburyport & Its Vicinity v. PufferMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
- Cleveland v. Hampden Savings BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1902
- Boucher v. Hamilton Manufacturing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
- First Baptist Society v. DexterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
- E. Kronman, Inc. v. Bunn Bros.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Birnbaum v. PamoukisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
- Jose v. LymanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
- Wyness v. CrowleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Giles v. GilesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
- Welch v. FloryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.