State v. Bartok, 2006-Coa-026 (7-3-2007)

OPINION

{¶ 1} Defendant Gail Ann Bartok appeals a judgment of the Ashland Municipal Court which found her guilty of violating R.C. 951.02, permitting her pig to run at large. Appellant assigns four errors to the trial court:

{¶ 2} "I. MISAPPLICATION OF LAW TO FACTS.

{¶ 3} "II. VERDICT AGAINST THE MANIFEST WEIGHT OF THE EVIDENCE.

{¶ 4} "III. JUDGE FRIDLINE'S REFUSAL TO PROPERLY INSTRUCT THE JURY (PREJUDICIAL ERROR).

{¶ 5} "IV. IMPROPER FINAL STATEMENT TO THE JURY BY SPECIAL PROSECUTOR DAVE HUNTER."

{¶ 6} The matter was tried to a jury. The State presented evidence appellant's pig was loose on…