Legal Opinion

Burnett v. Rice

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 5, 1988No. 87-1686PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellants contend that R.C. Chapter 951 imposes strict liability upon owners of animals which run at large upon public thoroughfares and whose activities cause damage to others. R.C. 951.02 provides as follows:

“No person, who is the owner or keeper of horses, mules, cattle, sheep, *45goats, swine, or geese, shall permit them to run at large in the public road, highway, street, lane, or alley, or upon unenclosed land, or cause such animals to be herded, kept, or detained for the purpose of grazing on premises other than those owned or lawfully occupied by the owner or keeper of such animals.
“The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Drew v. GrossOhio Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Reed v. MolnarOhio Supreme Court · 1981

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Jaworowski v. Medical Radiation ConsultantsOhio Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Lollar v. PoeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  3. City of Bexley v. SelcerOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. Steele v. McNattOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Rayner v. LoweOhio Court of Appeals · 1989

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API