Legal Opinion

State v. Bartok, 07coa011 (9-3-2008)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 3, 2008No. 07COA011Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

{¶ 1} On November 30, 2006, appellant, Gail Ann Bartok, was cited for permitting her pigs to run at large in violation of R.C. 951.02. A jury trial commenced on March 8, 2007. The jury found appellant guilty as charged. By judgment order filed April 3, 2007, the trial court sentenced appellant to thirty days in jail.

{¶ 2} Appellant filed an appeal and this matter is now before this court for consideration. Assignments of error are as follows:

I

{¶ 3} "MISAPPLICATION OF STANDARD OF CARE REQUIRED FOR CONVICTION."

II

{¶ 4} "VIOLATION OF DUE PROCESS DUE TO MISAPPLICATION STATED IN NUMBER 1…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Burnett v. RiceOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Rayner v. LoweOhio Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. State v. Bartok, 2006-Coa-026 (7-3-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API