Legal Opinion

Selby v. Schroeder

District Court, M.D. Tennessee

Decided October 18, 2021No. 2:20-cv-00016Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NORTHEASTERN DIVISION BECKY A. SELBY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 2:20-cv-00016 ) HOLLY T. SCHROEDER, ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Becky A. Selby’s fully briefed Motion to Dismiss Defendant Holly T. Schroeder’s Counter-Complaint (Doc. Nos. 106, 107, 115). For the following reasons, the Motion will be denied. I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND A. Selby’s Lawsuit1 Schroeder, a professional horse breeder, owned Niko, a horse from an esteemed breeding lineage. (Doc. No. 26 ¶¶ 9(a), 20). Because Niko was…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API