Legal Opinion
Heverly v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided July 19, 1990PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PALLADINO, Judge.
Deloris Heverly (Claimant) appeals from an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which affirmed a referee’s decision denying workmen’s compensation benefits to Claimant under Section 301(c)(1) of The Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act (Act), Act of June 2, 1915, P.L. 736, as amended, 77 P.S. § 411(1) (injury not in the course of employment). We affirm.
Claimant was employed by Ship N Shore/ Crystal Brands, Inc. (Employer) as a retail sales clerk. On July 3, 1986, Claimant completed her duties at 5:10 p.m. and left her place of employment to return home.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Commonwealth v. United States Steel Corp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Fashion Hosiery Shops v. Commonwealth, Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Dana Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Fetzer v. MichrinaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Giebel v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Tate v. GTE Hawaiian Telephone Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1994
- Sysco Food Services of Philadelphia v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Thomas Jefferson University Hospital v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- US Airways, Inc. and Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc. v. WCAB (Bockelman)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- Davenport v. City & County of Honolulu, Honolulu Fire DepartmentHawaii Supreme Court · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.