Legal Opinion

Town of Brighton v. Rochester Vulcanite Pavement Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 11, 1933PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Love, J,

Decision on this application, made at the close of the plaintiff’s case in connection with motions for dismissal, was reserved. It is an application for the allowance of extra costs under section 1513 of the Civil Practice Act on the grounds that the case was a difficult and extraordinary one.

As applicable here section 1513 of the Civil Practice Act reads: “ in a difficult and extraordinary case, when a defense has been interposed in an action, * * *, the court, in its discretion, also may award to any party, a further sum, as follows;

2 * * *

“ 2. In any action * * * where a defense…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Warren v. . WarrenNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
  2. Assets Collecting Co. v. MyersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
  3. Hine v. LaustererNew York Supreme Court · 1930

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. Hemingway (In Re Hemingway)District Court, N.D. New York · 1983
  2. W. T. Grant Co. v. SrogiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  3. Ciufo v. CiufoNew York Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Town of Brighton v. Rochester Vulcanite Pavement Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
  5. Metropolitan Savings Bank v. TuttleNew York Supreme Court · 1944

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API