Legal Opinion

Town of Brighton v. Rochester Vulcanite Pavement Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 15, 1935PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdgcomb, J.

Plaintiff appeals from three judgments entered upon motions for dismissal on the merits at the close of plaintiff’s case and for a nonsuit, and from two separate orders of the trial Court granting the defendants Lozier and Rochester Vulcanite Pavement Company an extra allowance of costs in the sum of $1,000 each.

The action is brought by the town of Brighton against the town’s engineer, a paving contractor, and the contractor’s bondsman to recover the damages which the town claims to have sustained by reason of the alleged defective Work of the contractor. A recovery is sought upon two…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Smith v. New York Central RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
  2. Swan v. StilesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
  3. Campbell v. . EmslieNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
  4. Town of Brighton v. Rochester Vulcanite Pavement Co.New York Supreme Court · 1933

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. W. T. Grant Co. v. SrogiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  2. Ciufo v. CiufoNew York Supreme Court · 1946
  3. O'Hara v. DerschugNew York Supreme Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API