Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Provident Life & Trust Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 3, 1901No. 3914PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Pierce County. — Hon. Thomas Carroll, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hadley, J.

Respondent brought this action against appellant, a corporation organized under the laws of the state of Pennsylvania, having an agent in this state upon whom process may he served. For his cause of action respondent alleges substantially as follows: That on the 24th day of January, 1894, in an action then pending in the superior court of Pierce county, wherein the Tacoma *194National Bank was plaintiff and Otis Sprague and others were defendants, the said court gave judgment in favor of said bank, and against the said defendants therein, for the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Oelrichs v. SpainSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. Lovell v. House of the Good ShepherdWashington Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Elder v. KutnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Donahue v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Garrett v. LoganSupreme Court of Alabama · 1851

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Miller v. DonovanIdaho Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Mann v. BeckerWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Puget Sound Harbor No. 16 of the American Ass'n of Masters & Pilots of Steam Vessels v. Aetna Accident & Liability Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Hecla Mining Co. v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Hecla Mining Co. v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1925

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API