Legal Opinion

Hecla Mining Co. v. Smith

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 14, 1925No. 19341. Department TwoPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

— This is an action on a bond for damages for tbe alleged wrongful suing out of an emergency restraining order. Service was bad on only tbe Maryland Casualty Company, surety on tbe bond, in whose favor final judgment was entered. Plaintiffs have appealed.

Sarah E. Smith and Eugene B. Day, stockholders of tbe Hecla Mining Company, a corporation, brought an action to enjoin tbe Company and its officers from consummating a proposed purchase by it and tbe Bunker Hill & Sullivan Mining & Concentrating Company of certain mining property belonging to the Star Mining Company. They asked for an…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Donahue v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Mann v. BeckerWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Anderson v. Provident Life & Trust Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Thompson v. BensonWashington Supreme Court · 1905

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Chin on v. Culinary Workers Etc. UnionWashington Supreme Court · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API