Miller v. State
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
SHEPARD, Chief Justice.
Today we must decide whether the constitutional right of confrontation prohibits the admission of the videotaped statement of a child molesting victim when the child does not testify at trial and the defendant is not afforded the opportunity to cross-examine.
Appellant Annabel Miller, her husband, her son, and her son-in-law were accused of systematically molesting several of the family grandchildren over a period of four years. The initial charges against Miller consisted of four counts of child molesting, three counts of incest, two counts of confinement, and two…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Barber v. PageSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by91 opinions
- State v. SwanWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- Collins v. DayIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
- Brady v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
- Boehm v. Town of St. JohnIndiana Supreme Court · 1996
- Baldwin v. ReaganIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.