State v. Herring
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtBurgess, J.
¶ 1. Defendant Lee. Herring appeals his conviction in Windham District Court for aggravated sexual assault, sexual assault on a minor, and lewd or lascivious conduct with a child. He contends the trial court erred by excluding evidence proffered to impeach the complainant’s credibility, by restricting defendant’s cross-examination of another witness, by admitting evidence to impeach defendant, by excluding evidence of bias and by refusing to grant defendant a continuance. We conclude that in excluding defendant’s impeachment evidence the trial court committed reversible error by violating his…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- New York v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- State v. OscarsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 2004
- State v. LipkaSupreme Court of Vermont · 2002
- State v. BerardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1974
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- State v. MadiganSupreme Court of Vermont · 2015
- State v. Glen Haskins, Jr.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2016
- State v. MadiganSupreme Court of Vermont · 2015
- State v. Venessa Sarkisian-KennedySupreme Court of Vermont · 2020
- State v. Daniel L. LarkinSupreme Court of Vermont · 2018
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.