Legal Opinion

State v. Madigan

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided April 17, 2015No. 13-242PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*216¶ 1.

Robinson, J.

Defendant Charles (Hank) Madigan appeals his conviction of three counts of lewd and lascivious behavior with a child. On appeal, defendant argues (1) that the trial court erred in allowing two witnesses to testify to the victim’s character and reputation for truthfulness; (2) that the trial court admitted impermissible hearsay; and (3) that the prosecution’s closing argument was improper. We reverse.

¶2. The testimony at trial reflected the following. The victim, A.R., had been close friends with defendant’s daughter since early childhood. A.R. was somewhat estranged from her…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. State v. NewellSupreme Court of Iowa · 2006
  2. Commonwealth v. KingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
  3. United States v. Leon A. CohenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  4. United States v. CardasciaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
  5. United States v. Alan James DringCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. Daniel W. E.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2016
  2. State v. Matthew WebsterSupreme Court of Vermont · 2017
  3. State v. Glen Haskins, Jr.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2016
  4. State v. MadiganSupreme Court of Vermont · 2015
  5. State v. Lamar ScalesSupreme Court of Vermont · 2017

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API