Donald G. Ford, Transferee v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Per curiam
In the taxpayer’s suit for recovery of income taxes alleged to have been illegally assessed and collected, the Government did not rebut the evidence that bad debt recoveries were improperly retained in the company’s income, but defended on the technical ground that there was a variance between the refund claim and the evidence and that the claim was not sufficiently specific to comply with the statute and the regulation. 26 U.S.C. 1964 ed., § 7422; 26 C.F.R., Sec. 1.11-1.
We agree with District Judge Gordon that there was no variance and that the refund claim was sufficiently specific to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Kales v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1940
- Lucas v. Fidelity & Columbia Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1937
- Belknap v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1944
3Cited by11 opinions
- American National Bank & Trust Company, Not Personally, but as of the Estate of Robert C. Usher, Deceased v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
- Union Commerce Bank, of the Estate of Freeman Smith, Deceased v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
- Union Commerce Bank v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1978
- Federal Express Corp. v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1986
- Mok Partners v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1987
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.