Kales v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HAMILTON, Circuit Judge.
Appellant’s action to recover income taxes alleged to have been overpaid for the calendar year 1919 was dismissed, from which order she prosecutes this appeal. The facts out of which the controversy arises are undisputed and substantially as follows:
Prior to March 1, 1913, appellant was the owner of 535 shares of Ford Motor Company stock. Its majority stockholder made an offer to purchase the stock of the minority and on or about May. 19, 1919, the Commissioner of Internal Revenue, at the request of the stockholders, determined the March 1, 1913, value of each share to…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Georgia, Florida & Alabama Railway Co. v. Blish Milling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
- United States v. AndrewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States v. Factors & Finance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Smietanka v. Indiana Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Woodworth v. KalesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1928
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- United States v. KalesSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- United States v. PierottiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1946
- Rogan v. FerryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1946
- Levitsky v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1992
- McMahon v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1959
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.