Legal Opinion

Mok Partners v. United States

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided October 29, 1987No. 86 C 10152PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

ASPEN, District Judge:

Plaintiffs MOK Partners, Frank Malart-sik, Paul Obholtz, and Kenneth Kowalski brought this action against the United States to challenge a $24,400.00 penalty assessed by the Internal Revenue Service. Plaintiffs moved for partial summary judgment. The United States moved for summary judgment. For the following reasons, we grant the United States’ motion and deny plaintiffs’ motion.

I

The following facts are undisputed. 1 In 1983, MOK Partners convinced five individuals, a two-person partnership, and an investment partnership (Greenwood Investment…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. United States v. Felt & Tarrant Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. William W. Boyd and Ruth G. Boyd v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  4. Winn-Dixie Montgomery, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
  5. Ottawa Silica Company v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Horton Homes, Inc., N.D. Horton, Jr., Jacqueline P. Horton, N.D. Horton, Sr. And Maude Horton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
  2. Stern v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API