Legal Opinion

People v. Canales

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 29, 1936No. Crim. 1454PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPullen, P. J.

Defendant was charged with a violation of chapter 359 of the Statutes of 1925, as amended in 1931, commonly known as the Deadly Weapons Act, in that at a certain time and place he -did “unlawfully, maliciously, and feloniously possess an instrument or weapon of the kind commonly known as a black jack or billy”. To this information defendant entered a plea of not guilty, and subsequently filed a demurrer thereto on the ground of uncertainty in that it did not appear therefrom whether defendant was charged with possessing a blackjack or a billy. The demurrer was overruled and the cause…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. EdwardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  2. People v. MulherinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  3. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  4. People v. EctonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. People v. GrubbCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  2. People v. GuyetteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  3. People v. GuyetteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  4. Davis v. Donald L.California Court of Appeal · 1978
  5. People v. RaleighCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API