Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Mulherin

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 27, 1934No. Crim. No. 2507PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDesmond, J.

Defendant was found guilty by a jury of “Violation Chapter 339, Laws of 1923, as amended, sec. 1, Act 1970, Deering’s General Laws, Deadly Weapons Act, a felony, as charged in Count II of the information.” His motion for a new trial was ordered denied and the appeal is from the judgment and order.

The information charged in count II that violation of the above-mentioned law was committed in this: that defendant “did wilfully, unlawfully and feloniously have in his possession what is commonly known as a ‘black-jack’ ”. The defendant upon his trial admitted ownership of the instrument which the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. . PersceNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
  2. People v. BrownMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
  3. People v. FergusonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  4. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. People v. GrubbCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  2. People v. FavaloraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  3. Commonwealth v. FestaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  4. People v. WasleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  5. People v. WinchellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API