Legal Opinion
In Re Opinion of Justices
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided April 27, 2010No. Request of the House of Representatives, No. 2010-166PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
To the Honorable House of Representatives:
The undersigned justices of the Supreme Court, reaching differing conclusions, return the following separate replies to the questions presented in your resolution.
OPINION OF CHIEF JUSTICE BRODERICK AND JUSTICES DUGGAN AND CONBOY
House Bill (HB) 1146 proposes to amend RSA 265-A:7 (Supp. 2009) and RSA 265-A:8 (Supp. 2009) to eliminate the requirement that a second sample of breath taken pursuant to RSA 265-A:4 (Supp. 2009) be collected or preserved. RSA 265-A:4-:16 (Supp. 2009) comprise the statutory scheme relating to the implied consent of motor…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- California v. TrombettaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. BallSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
- Baca v. SmithArizona Supreme Court · 1979
- State v. VelascoArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- MacK v. CruikshankCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. VilleneuveSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010