Legal Opinion

State v. Villeneuve

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided June 3, 2010No. 2009-011PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDuggan, J.

The defendant, Wayne Villeneuve, was tried in the Lancaster District Court {Sargent, J.) and found guilty of driving under the influence of intoxicating liquor. See RSA 265-A:2 (Supp. 2009). He appeals, arguing that the trial court erroneously: (1) admitted a letter in violation of his Confrontation Clause rights; (2) admitted the results of his breath test; and (3) concluded that the State did not commit a discovery violation. We affirm.

The record reveals the following. In the early morning of July 7, 2007, Officer Blaine Hall of the Northumberland Police saw the defendant driving toward…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. BuschWisconsin Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Appeal of Astro Spectacular, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1994
  3. State v. DoddsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
  4. State v. AinsworthSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
  5. State v. EricsonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. FurgalSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2012
  2. State v. Jeffrey R. KeenanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2018
  3. State v. EtienneSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API