Legal Opinion

Pfeifer v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided April 16, 1982No. 81-1928PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

ALDISERT, Circuit Judge.

Jones & Laughlin Steel Corporation appeals from a judgment in favor of plaintiff Howard E. Pfeifer in a third-party negligence action under the Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act. The major question presented is whether the district court erred in applying the “total offset method” as a federal rule of damages, wherein the discount factor used to reduce future earnings to present worth is presumed offset by future inflation. We find no error and affirm.

I

Pfeifer was employed by appellant Jones & Laughlin (J&L) as a landing helper on…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. D'Oench, Duhme & Co. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  5. Southern Pacific Company v. JensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1916

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Murphy v. International Robotic Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 2000
  2. Culver v. Slater Boat Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
  3. Ruth Culver, Cross-Appellees v. Slater Boat Co., Cross Europirates International, Inc., and Cross- Appellees-Appellants v. Odeco Drilling, CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
  4. United States v. Malik NasirCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020
  5. Sandra K. Barnes and Robert E. Barnes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API