Sandra K. Barnes and Robert E. Barnes v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
ALDISERT, Circuit Judge.
The government’s appeal from a judgment in a claim under the Swine Flu Act 1 tracks a narrow compass. It complains that the district court’s award of damages for lost future earnings was excessive and punitive because it did not account for future income taxes and was not reduced to present worth. We conclude that the district court’s fact finding was not clearly erroneous and that the court did not err in the selection, interpretation, or application of legal precepts. Accordingly, we affirm. 2
I
At the end of November 1976, Sandra Barnes, a young…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Story Parchment Co. v. Paterson Parchment Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Truax v. CorriganSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. LiepeltSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Kaczkowski v. BolubaszSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Marion Domeracki v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Culver v. Slater Boat Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
- U.S. Industries, Inc. v. Touche Ross & Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- Burns v. Pepsi-Cola Metropolitan Bottling Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- McDonald v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1983
- Hull v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.