Legal Opinion

Brunswick Corporation v. Liquor Control Commission

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided May 5, 1981PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, J.

This appeal presents the question whether the state liqnor control commission may issue a permit for the sale of alcoholic beverages at an establishment within a town which has validly forbidden the sale of any alcoholic beverage other than beer. The plaintiffs, Brunswick Corporation and Samuel J. Papale, Jr., operate a bowling alley situated within the general business district of Woodbridge, where there would be no prohibition against the sale of beer by a duly licensed druggist, hotel, package store, or by certain other establishments. See General Statutes §§ 30-15 and 30-16 through…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  4. Craig v. BorenSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Duke Power Co. v. Carolina Environmental Study Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Struckman v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  2. Kyrtatas v. Stop & Shop, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  3. Keogh v. City of BridgeportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  4. Schieffelin & Co. v. Department of Liquor ControlSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  5. All Brand Importers, Inc. v. Department of Liquor ControlSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API