Legal Opinion

Ferdinand v. Agricultural, Etc., of Watertown, NY

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided April 2, 1956Published

1Opinion of the Court

40 N.J. Super. 1 (1956)

122 A.2d 1

E. JAY FERDINAND AND PHYLLIS C. FERDINAND, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,

v.

AGRICULTURAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF WATERTOWN, NEW YORK, A CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, AND APPLETON & COX, INC., ETC., DEFENDANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued March 12, 1956.

Decided April 2, 1956.

Before Judges GOLDMANN, FREUND and CONFORD.

Mr. George I. Janow of the New York Bar argued the cause for the defendant-appellant (Mr. Samuel Dreskin, attorney).

Mr. Frederick C. Vonhof argued the cause for the plaintiffs-respondents (Mr. Albert M. Neiss, attorney).

The…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Gunning v. CooleySupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. CooganSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Jerke v. Delmont State BankSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Mortgage Corp. of NJ v. Aetna Cas. & Surety Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
  5. Polhemus v. Prudential Realty Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1907

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API