Legal Opinion

Monumental Paving & Excavating, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Manufacturers' Ass'n

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided November 27, 1996No. Civil No. AMD 96-1722PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*497MEMORANDUM

DAVIS, District Judge.

This ease arises from an insurance coverage dispute between plaintiff, Monumental Paving & Excavating, Inc. (“Monumental”), and defendant, Pennsylvania Manufacturers’ Association Insurance Company (“PMA”). This Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Pending before the Court are the plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment and the defendant’s cross-motion for summary judgment.1 As the parties have fully briefed the issues presented, no hearing is deemed necessary. Local Rule 105.6 (D.Md.1995). For the reasons set forth below, I shall grant…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Melissa R. Jackson v. Progressive Advanced Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API