Legal Opinion

Kaelin v. Michelson

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 26, 1941PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHooley, J.

Motion to dismiss the complaint, under rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice, on the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.

The action is one to foreclose a second mortgage, dated April 9, 1932, payable in quarterly installments of seventy-five dollars on account of principal, together with interest. The defendants defaulted in the payment of the installment of principal due April 9, 1933, and subsequent installments of principal, and further defaulted in the payment of the balance of principal which became due on April 9, 1935. Interest and taxes…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Block v. HirshSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  3. Matter of People (Tit. Mtge. Guar. Co.)New York Court of Appeals · 1934
  4. Klinke v. SamuelsNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
  5. First Trust Co. v. SmithNebraska Supreme Court · 1938

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. East New York Savings Bank v. Imar Realty Co.New York Supreme Court · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API