Legal Opinion
Director of Highways v. Olrich
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided January 26, 1966No. 39428PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
It is recognized in this state that property taken for public use shall be valued as of the date of trial, that being the date of take, unless the appropriator has taken possession prior thereto, in which event compensation is determined as of the time of the taking. In re Appropration for Highway Purposes, 167 Ohio St. 463; Nichols v. City of Cleveland, 104 Ohio St. 19; Board of Education of Cleveland City School Dist. v. Hecht, 102 Ohio App. 521 (appeal dismissed, 165 Ohio St. 200); In re Appropriation for Highway Purposes, 90 Ohio App. 471.
The reasons for this rule are well stated in the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Cleveland v. CarcioneOhio Court of Appeals · 1963
- Research Associates, Inc. v. New Haven Redevelopment AgencySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1964
- In Re Appropriation of EasementOhio Court of Appeals · 1951
- Board of Education of Cleveland City School District v. HechtOhio Court of Appeals · 1955
3Cited by16 opinions
- Bekos v. MasheterOhio Supreme Court · 1968
- Wray v. StvartakOhio Court of Appeals · 1997
- General Baking Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1967
- In Re Appropriation for Hwy. Purposes of Land of WinkelmanOhio Court of Appeals · 1968
- Evans v. HopeOhio Supreme Court · 1984
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.