Bekos v. Masheter
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHerbert, J.
May a court establish a date of take for tfie purpose of evaluating private property appropriated for a public purpose which is earlier than tfie date of trial or tfie actual taking of possession by tfie appropriating authority? In tfie ordinary case, tfie rule is stated in tfie first paragraph of tfie syllabus in Director of Highways v. Olrich, 5 Ohio St. 2d 70, which reads:
“Where a public authority having tfie power of eminent domain takes possession of property prior to tfie trial of tfie action to assess compensation, such compensation shall be awarded on tfie basis of the value of tfie…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Smith v. Erie Rd. Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1938
- Cleveland v. CarcioneOhio Court of Appeals · 1963
- Director of Highways v. OlrichOhio Supreme Court · 1966
- State Ex Rel. Steubenville Ice Co. v. MerrellOhio Supreme Court · 1934
3Cited by18 opinions
- Lange v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1976
- Masheter v. KebeOhio Court of Appeals · 1973
- Wray v. StvartakOhio Court of Appeals · 1997
- Thurow v. City of DallasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
- City of Middletown v. CampbellOhio Court of Appeals · 1984
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.