Hillcrest Terrace Corp. v. City of Rapid City
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
In a former proceeding the plaintiffs above named sought and were granted a writ of mandamus which commanded the defendants to construct a described extension to the distribution system of the water utility of the city of Rapid City. The extension was required to serve property plaintiffs were improving with valuable dwellings. In that proceeding the court found that the refusal of the defendants to make the described extension of its mains was “wilful, arbitrary, unreasonable and discriminatory” and stated that no determination was made of .the damages suffered by plaintiffs. The city…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Gaines v. WhiteSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1892
- Calmenson Clothing Co. v. KrugerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1938
- Wheeler v. HugillSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1940
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hess Construction Co. v. Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
- Hanig v. City of WinnerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- Reif v. First National Bank of the Black HillsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- Tony Hanig v. City of WinnerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008