Lamb v. Council Bluffs Ins.
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Deeatu/r District OovH. AotioN on a policy of insurance against loss or damage by fire. The defenses pleaded and relied on are sufficiently referred to in the opinion. Trial by jury. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtSeevers, J.
I. To the petition of intervention of Bow- • ersock, the defendant demurred on the ground that the 1. practice qSesSo^not considered. acti°n, as to ilim> was barred by the statute of limitations. The demurrer was overruled. The com-t also gave certain instructions bearing on the issue between him, the plaintiff and defendant, which the latter claims to be erroneous. The jury found that the plaintiff was entitled to recover the whole amount of the loss and therefore found against Bowersock’s right to recover. Now, it seems to us to be wholly immaterial, as far as the defendant is concerned,…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Davis v. Phoenix InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Key v. Des Moines InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1889
- Carey v. Home InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1896
- Collins v. Iowa Manufacturers InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1918
- First National Bank of Marshalltown v. WrightSupreme Court of Iowa · 1891
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.