Legal Opinion

First National Bank of Marshalltown v. Wright

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 7, 1891PublishedCited by 13 opinions

'Appeal from Polk District Court. — Hon. Charles A. Bishop, Judge. Action upon a promissory note. The defense was a failure of consideration. There was a verdict and judgment for the plaintiff, from which the defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtGranger, J.

I. A principal ground of complaint by the appellant is based upon the action of the district •court in giving certain instructions involving an issue not presented by the pleadings, and in admitting evidence for its support. The execution and delivery of the note were admitted by the answer, and a total failure of consideration pleaded, as to which the court said to the jury:

“The defendant says that the consideration for said note was the purchase by the defendant Wright of 1. Pleading: evidence: instructions. the not for twenty thousand dollars, which has been introduced in evidence as…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Edgerly v. Farmers' InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1876
  2. Smith v. WolfSupreme Court of Iowa · 1881
  3. Wood v. WhittonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1885
  4. Kervick v. MitchellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1885
  5. Fauble & Smith v. DavisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1878

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Shaw v. AddisonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1945
  2. St. Charles Savings Bank v. DenkeeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1918
  3. Thompson v. ButlerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1937
  4. Voorhees v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
  5. Ford v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1898

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API