Legal Opinion

Born v. Industrial Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 13, 1931Published

1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, C. J.

Two questions are raised upon the appeal: (1st) Was the commission authorized to award compensation without a finding to the effect that the claimant, August C. Kegler, father of the deceased, was partially dependent? (2d) Does the evidence sustain the finding of the commission that the defendant August C. Kegler was at the time of the death of his son an unestranged parent?

Sec. 102.Ó9 (4a), Stats. 1929, provides in part:

“If the deceased employee leaves no one wholly dependent upon him for support, partial dependency and death benefits therefor shall be as follows :
“(a) An unestranged…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Milwaukee Basket Co. v. WieckiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Wisconsin Mutual Liability Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Zurich General Accident & Liability Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Thunder Lake Lumber Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Interlake Pulp & Paper Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API