Wisconsin Mutual Liability Co. v. Industrial Commission
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtVinje, C. J.
The constitutionality of that part of the section above quoted was argued, but we express no opinion upon that subject because it is not involved in this case. The dependency of parents upon their children must be shown as a matter of fact in each case. The law does not infer it. Wisconsin D. Co. v. Industrial Comm. 161 Wis. 42, 152 N. W. 460. And dependency exists only when the amount contributed by a minor child the preceding year exceeds the cost of his support for such year. Milwaukee B. Co. v. Wiecki, 173 Wis. 391, 396, 181 N. W. 308. Here the cost of support exceeded the minor’s…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Milwaukee Basket Co. v. WieckiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1921
- Wisconsin Drainage Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1915
3Cited by8 opinions
- Duluth-Superior Milling Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
- Thunder Lake Lumber Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
- Interlake Pulp & Paper Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
- City of Baraboo v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
- Peterson v. Thief River Falls Welding Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.