Legal Opinion

Application of Ducci

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided September 28, 1955No. Patent Appeal 6131PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

O’CONNELL, Acting Chief Judge.

This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office rejecting, in its original decision and on reconsideration, all the claims in appellant’s patent application entitled “Multicellular Vitreous Materials.” In the brief for the appellant, his counsel allege here that the invention defined by the 15 rejected claims is comprehensively stated in the following two claims:

“3. As an article of manufacture, a multicellular glass product constituted by glass having a coefficient of linear expansion which is lower than about 65 x…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re ThuauCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1943
  2. Application of CraigeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951
  3. In re HeritageCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1946

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Joseph Bancroft & Sons Co. v. WatsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1959
  2. Application of Hubert C. Wynne and Frank CousenCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1958
  3. Elrick Rim Company v. Reading Tire Machinery Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
  4. Elrick Rim Co. v. Reading Tire Machinery Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
  5. In re WynneCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API